Rechercher une page de manuel

Chercher une autre page de manuel:


Langue: en

Version: 263629 (debian - 07/07/09)

Section: 1 (Commandes utilisateur)


ss, ssb - Single Step





The ss command is used to execute a single instruction and return to the kernel debugger.

Both the instruction that was single-stepped and the next instruction to execute are printed.

The ssb command will execute instructions from the current value of the instruction pointer. Each instruction may be printed as it is executed, depending upon architecture; execution will stop at any instruction which would cause the flow of control to change (e.g. branch, call, interrupt instruction, return, etc.)


On sparc64, there are some circumstances where single-stepping can be dangerous. Do not single-step across an instruction which changes the interrupt-enable bit in %tstate. Do not single step through code which is invoked when entering or leaving the kernel, particularly any kernel entry code before %tl is set to 0, or any kernel exit code after %tl is set to 1.




Other processors are held in the kernel debugger when the instruction is traced. Single stepping though code that requires a lock which is in use by another processor is an exercise in futility, it will never succeed.


When a kdb event occurs, one cpu (the initial cpu) enters kdb state. It uses a cross system interrupt to interrupt the other cpus and bring them all into kdb state. All cpus run with interrupts disabled while they are inside kdb, this prevents most external events from disturbing the kernel while kdb is running. Note: Disabled interrupts means that any I/O that relies on interrupts cannot proceed while kdb is in control, devices can time out. The clock tick is also disabled, machines will lose track of time while they are inside kdb.

Even with interrupts disabled, some non-maskable interrupt events will still occur, these can disturb the kernel while you are debugging it. The initial cpu will still accept NMI events, assuming that kdb was not entered for an NMI event. Any cpu where you use the SS or SSB commands will accept NMI events, even after the instruction has finished and the cpu is back in kdb. This is an unavoidable side effect of the fact that doing SS[B] requires the cpu to drop all the way out of kdb, including exiting from the NMI event that brought the cpu into kdb. Under normal circumstances the only NMI event is for the NMI oopser and that is kdb aware so it does not disturb the kernel while kdb is running.

Sometimes doing SS or SSB on ix86 will allow one interrupt to proceed, even though the cpu is disabled for interrupts. I have not been able to track this one down but I suspect that the interrupt was pending when kdb was entered and it runs when kdb exits through IRET even though the popped flags are marked as cli(). If any ix86 hardware expert can shed some light on this problem, please notify the kdb maintainer.


 kdb> bp gendisk_head datar 4
 Data Access Breakpoint #0 at 0xc024ddf4 (gendisk_head) in dr0 is enabled on cpu 0
 for 4 bytes
 kdb> go
 [root@host /root]# cat /proc/partitions
 Entering kdb on processor 0 due to Debug Exception @ 0xc01845e3
 Read/Write breakpoint #0 at 0xc024ddf4
 [0]kdb> ssb
 sd_finish+0x7b:  movzbl 0xc02565d4,%edx
 sd_finish+0x82:  leal   0xf(%edx),%eax
 sd_finish+0x85:  sarl   $0x4,%eax
 sd_finish+0x88:  movl   0xc0256654,%ecx
 sd_finish+0x8e:  leal   (%eax,%eax,4),%edx
 sd_finish+0x91:  leal   (%eax,%edx,2),%edx
 sd_finish+0x94:  movl   0xc0251108,%eax
 sd_finish+0x99:  movl   %eax,0xffffffc(%ecx,%edx,4)
 sd_finish+0x9d:  movl   %ecx,0xc0251108
 sd_finish+0xa3:  xorl   %ebx,%ebx
 sd_finish+0xa5:  cmpb   $0x0,0xc02565d4
 [0]kdb> go
 [root@host /root]#
 [0]kdb> ss
 sys_read:   pushl  %ebp
 SS trap at 0xc01274c1
 sys_read+0x1:   movl   %esp,%ebp
 [0]kdb> ss
 sys_read+0x1:   movl   %esp,%ebp
 SS trap at 0xc01274c3
 sys_read+0x3:   subl   $0xc,%esp
 [0]kdb> ss
 sys_read+0x3:   subl   $0xc,%esp
 SS trap at 0xc01274c6
 sys_read+0x6:   pushl  %edi
Nous ne louons d'ordinaire de bon coeur que ceux qui nous admirent.
-+- François de La Rochefoucauld (1613-1680), Maximes 356 -+-